Recording Specific Entheseal Changes of Fibrocartilaginous Entheses: Initial Tests Using the Coimbra Method
Identifieur interne : 000364 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000363; suivant : 000365Recording Specific Entheseal Changes of Fibrocartilaginous Entheses: Initial Tests Using the Coimbra Method
Auteurs : C. Y. Henderson [Portugal, Royaume-Uni] ; V. Mariotti [Italie, France] ; D. Pany-Kucera [Autriche] ; S. Villotte [Royaume-Uni] ; C. Wilczak [États-Unis]Source :
- International Journal of Osteoarchaeology [ 1047-482X ] ; 2013-03.
Abstract
A working group was established in 2009 during a workshop in Coimbra, Portugal to review the various methodologies used to record entheseal changes (EC) and develop a standardised system to facilitate comparisons across studies. This paper presents the first results of the Coimbra method, a new qualitative method for recording fibrocartilaginous entheses based on the types of changes observed. Materials and methods: The new method divides the enthesis into a margin (only the area opposite the acute angle of fibre attachment) and surface (which also includes the remaining margin). Five features are recorded: bone formation, erosion, fine porosity, macro‐porosity and cavitation. A total of 67 male skeletons from the identified SIMON collection, Geneva, Switzerland, all of whom were manual workers and aged between 20 and 79 years, were used for this study. Six skeletons were used by the authors as exemplars to determine standard criteria for recording each change. Thirty male skeletons were selected to test intra‐observer and inter‐observer error of the new method. An additional 31 skeletons were used for a preliminary test of the relationship between EC and age, using exploratory statistics and ordinal regression. Results: Intra‐observer and inter‐observer error had a similar percentage agreement of around 70%. The exploratory statistics indicated a general trend for increased scores of each feature with age, but ordinal regression demonstrated that this was not statistically significant (p < 0.05) for all features. Discussion: The recording method is repeatable for some entheses. The effect of the ageing process is dependent on enthesis and EC feature. Unlike most methods, the Coimbra method records EC features in detail; this has the advantage of allowing studies of the relationship between different EC and age as well as sex and occupation. Further studies on larger identified skeletal collections are needed to test the effect of age, sex and occupation. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/oa.2287
Affiliations:
- Autriche, France, Italie, Portugal, Royaume-Uni, États-Unis
- Californie, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, Vienne (Autriche)
- Marseille, San Francisco, Vienne (Autriche)
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 001855
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 001855
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000020
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 000365
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 000364
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Recording Specific Entheseal Changes of Fibrocartilaginous Entheses: Initial Tests Using the Coimbra Method</title><author><name sortKey="Henderson, C Y" sort="Henderson, C Y" uniqKey="Henderson C" first="C. Y." last="Henderson">C. Y. Henderson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mariotti, V" sort="Mariotti, V" uniqKey="Mariotti V" first="V." last="Mariotti">V. Mariotti</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pany Ucera, D" sort="Pany Ucera, D" uniqKey="Pany Ucera D" first="D." last="Pany-Kucera">D. Pany-Kucera</name></author><author><name sortKey="Villotte, S" sort="Villotte, S" uniqKey="Villotte S" first="S." last="Villotte">S. Villotte</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wilczak, C" sort="Wilczak, C" uniqKey="Wilczak C" first="C." last="Wilczak">C. Wilczak</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:3C8AED0A9391FAD785380BBA01CEBF2CFB9FBA34</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/oa.2287</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/3C8AED0A9391FAD785380BBA01CEBF2CFB9FBA34/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001855</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001855</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001855</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000020</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000020</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1047-482X:2013:Henderson C:recording:specific:entheseal</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000365</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000364</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000364</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Recording Specific Entheseal Changes of Fibrocartilaginous Entheses: Initial Tests Using the Coimbra Method</title><author><name sortKey="Henderson, C Y" sort="Henderson, C Y" uniqKey="Henderson C" first="C. Y." last="Henderson">C. Y. Henderson</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Portugal</country><wicri:regionArea>CIAS‐Centro de Investigação em Antropologia e Saúde, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Coimbra</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Archaeology, Durham University, Durham</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Durham</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">Portugal</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mariotti, V" sort="Mariotti, V" uniqKey="Mariotti V" first="V." last="Mariotti">V. Mariotti</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Experimental Evolutionary Biology, University of Bologna, Bologna</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Bologna</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>Laboratoire UMR 7268 ‐ ADéS ‐ Anthropologie bioculturelle Droit, Ethique et Santé, Faculté de Médecine, Marseille</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="region">Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur</region><region type="old region">Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur</region><settlement type="city">Marseille</settlement></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pany Ucera, D" sort="Pany Ucera, D" uniqKey="Pany Ucera D" first="D." last="Pany-Kucera">D. Pany-Kucera</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Autriche</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Anthropology, Natural History Museum, Vienna</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Vienne (Autriche)</settlement><region nuts="2" type="province">Vienne (Autriche)</region></placeName></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Autriche</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Vienne (Autriche)</settlement><region nuts="2" type="province">Vienne (Autriche)</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Villotte, S" sort="Villotte, S" uniqKey="Villotte S" first="S." last="Villotte">S. Villotte</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Archaeological, Geographical and Environmental Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Bradford</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wilczak, C" sort="Wilczak, C" uniqKey="Wilczak C" first="C." last="Wilczak">C. Wilczak</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Anthropology, San Francisco State University, CA, San Francisco</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">San Francisco</settlement><region type="state">Californie</region></placeName></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">International Journal of Osteoarchaeology</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Int. J. Osteoarchaeol.</title><idno type="ISSN">1047-482X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-1212</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><date type="published" when="2013-03">2013-03</date><biblScope unit="volume">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="152">152</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="162">162</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1047-482X</idno></series><idno type="istex">3C8AED0A9391FAD785380BBA01CEBF2CFB9FBA34</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/oa.2287</idno><idno type="ArticleID">OA2287</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1047-482X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">A working group was established in 2009 during a workshop in Coimbra, Portugal to review the various methodologies used to record entheseal changes (EC) and develop a standardised system to facilitate comparisons across studies. This paper presents the first results of the Coimbra method, a new qualitative method for recording fibrocartilaginous entheses based on the types of changes observed. Materials and methods: The new method divides the enthesis into a margin (only the area opposite the acute angle of fibre attachment) and surface (which also includes the remaining margin). Five features are recorded: bone formation, erosion, fine porosity, macro‐porosity and cavitation. A total of 67 male skeletons from the identified SIMON collection, Geneva, Switzerland, all of whom were manual workers and aged between 20 and 79 years, were used for this study. Six skeletons were used by the authors as exemplars to determine standard criteria for recording each change. Thirty male skeletons were selected to test intra‐observer and inter‐observer error of the new method. An additional 31 skeletons were used for a preliminary test of the relationship between EC and age, using exploratory statistics and ordinal regression. Results: Intra‐observer and inter‐observer error had a similar percentage agreement of around 70%. The exploratory statistics indicated a general trend for increased scores of each feature with age, but ordinal regression demonstrated that this was not statistically significant (p < 0.05) for all features. Discussion: The recording method is repeatable for some entheses. The effect of the ageing process is dependent on enthesis and EC feature. Unlike most methods, the Coimbra method records EC features in detail; this has the advantage of allowing studies of the relationship between different EC and age as well as sex and occupation. Further studies on larger identified skeletal collections are needed to test the effect of age, sex and occupation. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Autriche</li><li>France</li><li>Italie</li><li>Portugal</li><li>Royaume-Uni</li><li>États-Unis</li></country><region><li>Californie</li><li>Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur</li><li>Vienne (Autriche)</li></region><settlement><li>Marseille</li><li>San Francisco</li><li>Vienne (Autriche)</li></settlement></list><tree><country name="Portugal"><noRegion><name sortKey="Henderson, C Y" sort="Henderson, C Y" uniqKey="Henderson C" first="C. Y." last="Henderson">C. Y. Henderson</name></noRegion><name sortKey="Henderson, C Y" sort="Henderson, C Y" uniqKey="Henderson C" first="C. Y." last="Henderson">C. Y. Henderson</name></country><country name="Royaume-Uni"><noRegion><name sortKey="Henderson, C Y" sort="Henderson, C Y" uniqKey="Henderson C" first="C. Y." last="Henderson">C. Y. Henderson</name></noRegion><name sortKey="Villotte, S" sort="Villotte, S" uniqKey="Villotte S" first="S." last="Villotte">S. Villotte</name></country><country name="Italie"><noRegion><name sortKey="Mariotti, V" sort="Mariotti, V" uniqKey="Mariotti V" first="V." last="Mariotti">V. Mariotti</name></noRegion></country><country name="France"><region name="Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur"><name sortKey="Mariotti, V" sort="Mariotti, V" uniqKey="Mariotti V" first="V." last="Mariotti">V. Mariotti</name></region></country><country name="Autriche"><region name="Vienne (Autriche)"><name sortKey="Pany Ucera, D" sort="Pany Ucera, D" uniqKey="Pany Ucera D" first="D." last="Pany-Kucera">D. Pany-Kucera</name></region><name sortKey="Pany Ucera, D" sort="Pany Ucera, D" uniqKey="Pany Ucera D" first="D." last="Pany-Kucera">D. Pany-Kucera</name></country><country name="États-Unis"><region name="Californie"><name sortKey="Wilczak, C" sort="Wilczak, C" uniqKey="Wilczak C" first="C." last="Wilczak">C. Wilczak</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Archeologie/explor/PaleopathV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000364 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000364 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Archeologie
|area= PaleopathV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:3C8AED0A9391FAD785380BBA01CEBF2CFB9FBA34
|texte= Recording Specific Entheseal Changes of Fibrocartilaginous Entheses: Initial Tests Using the Coimbra Method
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. |  |